Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated

Subject: Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated
From: MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:45:28 +0100
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Jack" == MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


Jack> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

In principle, you could use XSLT with a different expression language from XPath - this just happens to be non-conformant.

Michael> It's not non-conformant if it it's done using the Michael>
Michael>
extensibility features of the language:
Michael> <YPath:value-of select="ypath-expression"/>
Good point. I hope there's no demand for it though :-)

Jack> Really??? I find XSLT itself reasonably lucid; it's XPath Jack> that I find obscure and hard-to-remember.

Really. Speaking as an implementor, I don't want to have to implement
 another expression language.

As an implementor, you don't; see MK's earlier post.



But I don't find XPath obscure at all.

There ya go. No doubt my brain was incorrectly wired-up by The Implementor.


--
Jack.

Current Thread