Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTML in an XML file and transformation to XSL:FO From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:37:51 +0200 (CEST) |
andrew welch wrote: > That's an interesting point - can you have a well-formed > XML document that isn't namespace-well-formed? The following document is well-formed (as per "Extensible Markup Language (XML)") but not namespace-well-formed (as per "Namespaces in XML"): <!-- No namespace declaration. --> <a:elem> <!-- More than one colon. --> <a:b:elem/> </a:elem> > Is it that "well-formed" existed before namespaces came > along, and now saying "well-formed" means both? Strictly speaking, I don't think "well-formed" as nothing to do with namespaces. A lot of XML tools now support "Namespaces in XML" (so restrict the possible document instances), and it is convenient to say "well-formed" for both the well-formedness defined in the XML REC and the namespace-well-formedness. But I'm not a namespaces expert. Maybe someone here will can confirm. Regards, --drkm p5.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Aug 13 20:13:39 GMT 2006 ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, andrew welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, andrew welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Problem with embeded XHTM, Michael Kay |
Month |