Subject: Re: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"? From: "Jay Bryant" <jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:26:34 -0500 |
"Sampling" works for that one - perhaps with an adjective such as "full" or "complete" to be clear. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 9:20 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"? > Do we have a good word for "take one from every group"? > > Something like "unique ranking", or "sampling", or "full > representation" or shall I say "setification"? > > On 8/27/06, M. David Peterson <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > extended: where a 'key delegate' would represent a single instance of > > multiple occurence. > > > > M. David Peterson wrote: > > > keyed delegation > > > > > > Jay Bryant wrote: > > >> That's a tough one. > > >> > > >> streamline? > > >> unify? > > >> reduce? > > >> trim? > > >> > > >> None of those quite fits, though. > > >> > > >> English has a number of nouns for the basic concept, including > > >> "unique" and > > >> "distinct". However, I can't think of (or find online) a verb for that > > >> concept. > > >> > > >> FWIW (not much, I suspect) > > >> > > >> Jay Bryant > > >> Bryant Communication Services > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitre Novatchev" > > >> <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 7:41 PM > > >> Subject: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> I want to use a single, short word to express the act of removing > > >>> duplicates from a node-set. I remember seing the word "de-duplication" > > >>> used, however it sounds ugly. > > >>> > > >>> Could someone suggest a better word, please? > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Dimitre Novatchev > > >>> --------------------------------------- > > >>> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant > > >>> intelligence. > > >>> --------------------------------------- > > >>> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > /M:D > > > > M. David Peterson > > http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Dimitre Novatchev > --------------------------------------- > Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. > --------------------------------------- > To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] What is a better word for, Jay Bryant | Thread | Re: [xsl] What is a better word for, Dean Fiala |
Re: [xsl] What is a better word for, Steve | Date | [xsl] XSL cant check if "File exist, Laky Tang |
Month |