Subject: RE: [xsl] Questions regarding match From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 14:23:52 +0100 |
Sorry, yes: I thought he really did mean "=", and then changed it back to contains() because I wasn't sure... Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 01 September 2006 13:54 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] Questions regarding match > > > > you can write this as > > > fields[contains(field/@id, 'Metadata') and contains(field/@id, > > 'subject.')] > > 'cept there's more than one field so this version would only > test the first field in xslt1 and generate an error in xslt2. > > David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Questions regarding match, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Outputting newline to XSL, cknell |
Re: [xsl] Questions regarding match, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Outputting newline to XSL, cknell |
Month |