Subject: RE: [xsl] problems around → From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:37:40 +0100 |
Were the characters defined in that order? The spec says that if there's more than one mapping, the last one should be used, so I would have expected "&rightarrow;". Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Marent [mailto:frank.marent@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 06 October 2006 08:09 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] problems around → > > we found the reason for that behaviour. a character map is > included in the xslt. we had (among 2100 others) five > occurences for the character → in there: > > .. > <xsl:output-character string="&ShortRightArrow;" > character="→"/> > .. > <xsl:output-character string="&srarr;" character="→"/> > .. > <xsl:output-character string="&rarr;" character="→"/> > .. > <xsl:output-character string="&RightArrow;" > character="→"/> > .. > <xsl:output-character string="&rightarrow;" > character="→"/> > .. > > the correct mapping to → was ignored, → > was added instead and the result bo8o8o8 was caused by that (we > need the transformation to entity references since our > mathml2eps converting tool needs entity references). > > no dtd error. no saxon error. frank error. > thanks michael, david and andrew for your kind help. > > frank
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] problems around →, Frank Marent | Thread | Re: [xsl] problems around →, Frank Marent |
Re: [xsl] problems around →, Frank Marent | Date | Re: [xsl] problems around →, Frank Marent |
Month |