RE: [xsl] XSLT 1: template inside of template?

["Brian Martinez" <Brian.Martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, as written, that stylesheet is not legal.

> Perhaps it was a "test", see how you coped with confrontation or
> something...

OT, but any company that would play such mind games during the interview
deserves to go out of business.

b.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Fawcett [mailto:joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:04 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1: template inside of template?
>
> You're correct, sounds like they seriously need an XSLT expert.
> Perhaps it was a "test", see how you coped with confrontation or
> something...
>
> Joe
>
>
> >From: "Chris Loschen" <christopher.loschen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To: "xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: [xsl] XSLT 1: template inside of template?
> >Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:58:08 -0500
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I don't have my reference book in front of me. I just wanted a quick
> sanity
> >check.
> >
> >I just got out of an interview and one of the questions was about
XSLT
> 1.0.
> >The sample code looked like this:
> >
> ><xsl:template .>
> ><tag1.>
> ><!-- various stuff -->
> ><xsl:template .>
> ><!-- more stuff -->
> ></xsl:template>
> ></tag1>
> ><!-- more stuff -->
> ></xsl:template>
> >
> >I pointed out to the interviewer that this wasn't legal: you can't
have
> an
> >xsl:template inside another xsl:template. She said that it was copied
> from
> >a working stylesheet, so it had to be legal, but I think there had to
be
> a
> >copy-and-paste error or something in there.
> >
> >Am I crazy? (Well, let's leave that one aside. am I crazy about
this?)
> XSLT
> >doesn't allow an xsl:template inside of another xsl:template, right?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Chris Loschen