Subject: Re: [xsl] question about identity transform From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:28:32 GMT |
> I haven't implemented an XSLT processor, but when is this distinction > even useful, in practice? In practice the processing order is externally visible as soon as you put xsl:message in any template (or call an extension function with side effects) The messages can (and sometimes do) come out in surprising orders, especially with respect to variable evaluation. More generally I often find it useful when replying on this list to stress that processing order is undefined, as it's one way of explaining why variables can not be re-bound. People coming from imperative programming languages often see this as an arbitrary, even bizarre, restriction imposed on the language, but once you understand the underlying processing model of a declarative language you'll see that this behaviour of variables is a natural and necessary feature of the language. Also that some declarative languages that do offer imperative features such as variable assignment can only do so by breaking (or at least straining) the underlying model, which usually leads to a rather more fragile programming environment. Of course this line of reasoning helps with some people and not with others, some people (perfectly reasonably) just want to know what the rules are, without being swamped in abstract programming language theory. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] question about identity t, Evan Lenz | Thread | RE: [xsl] question about identity t, Michael Kay |
[xsl] stumped on Safari, Don Smith | Date | RE: [xsl] question about identity t, Michael Kay |
Month |