Subject: RE: [xsl] i18n and l10n question From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:03:22 -0000 |
> The only place where the "my" prefix was used is the @name > of an xsl:function. So I guess the processor is already an > XSLT 2.0 processor. I guess the OP just copy and paste my > sample without adding the namespace declaration. > The stack trace showed that he was using Xalan/XSLTC. If you specify version="2.0" on a stylesheet and submit it to a 1.0 processor, it runs in forwards-compatibility mode. This means that the <xsl:function> element will be ignored; but if there's an XPath expression that calls my:function without declaring the prefix my, it's quite likely this will give a compile-time error. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: Fwd: [xsl] i18n and l10n questi, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question, David Carlisle |
Month |