Subject: SV: [xsl] Combine content of separate elements From: "Per Osnes" <per.osnes@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:21:19 +0100 |
Yes, of course! (Now I wonder: how could I NOT see that...) Thanks, Andrew. -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx] Sendt: 17. november 2006 12:57 Til: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Emne: Re: [xsl] Combine content of separate elements On 11/17/06, Per Osnes <per.osnes@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > I have a follow-up question to Michael's answer/explanation (below). > Is there any difference between these: > > a) select="following-sibling::*[self::para|self::para2][1][self::para2] > b) select="following-sibling::*[self::para2][1] > > Or rather: > a) the first following sibling that is a para or para2, provided it is a > para2. > b) the first following sibling that is a para2 > > I try to see the reason for using the first alternative, but am not able > to... (a) will only select the next <para2> element if it comes before the next <para> element, (b) will simply select the next <para2> It's actually a really impressive way of doing it...
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Combine content of separa, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Find out the existance of, cknell |
Re: [xsl] Combine content of separa, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] How can I select only unique , Robert Eaton |
Month |