Subject: RE: [xsl] XQuery and XSLT From: "Geert Josten" <geert.josten@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:48:36 +0100 |
> > It > > should not matter to you whether the DOM you get actually > resides in > > memory (completely) or on disk instead, other than for technical > > reasons, like performance etc. > > It matters a great deal! Most XSLT processors (like Saxon) > are limited in the size of document they can handle by the > available memory. For people who want to handle more than > 200Mb or so (and lots people do) an XSLT processor that works > directly on a disk-based source document would be a real > boon. If they don't have that capability, then frankly, > there's not much point. That is not what I meant, and yes I am convinced that processing over 200Mb is no more difficult than processing small documents with X-Hive in the background. Kind regards, Geert Drs. G.P.H. Josten Consultant Daidalos BV Source of Innovation Hoekeindsehof 1-4 2665 JZ Bleiswijk Tel.: +31 (0) 10 850 1200 Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199 www.daidalos.nl KvK 27164984 De informatie - verzonden in of met dit emailbericht - is afkomstig van Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XQuery and XSLT, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XQuery and XSLT, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] XQuery and XSLT, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Creating List with xsl:fu, Philip Vallone |
Month |