Subject: Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 25 Nov 2006 15:54:21 +0000 |
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Space and keystorkes do not need economy. Dimitre> This is not completely true. Well, no - not taken to extremes. >> Code is far more often read than written, so it is a false >> economy to worry about the number of keystrokes. Dimitre> Whenever there are 3-4 names and each of them is twice Dimitre> longer than it could be (just for "readability") very We weren't talking about twice as long - just one extra character per word. Dimitre> easy to end up with so long lines that one would need to Dimitre> scroll horizontally to read the whole text. Dimitre> This is a case, when putting too much effort for Dimitre> readability achieves the reverse effect. Well, yes. But I didn't see anyone arguing for such a practice. Dimitre> Also, here we are talking about "cosmetics", which is so Dimitre> much trivial and superficial compared to "real health" of Dimitre> a system. :o) No, it isn't trivial at all. It's a vital part of maintaining the "real health" of a system. A clear legible and consitent style is a huge benefit in that respect. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Transform inline-block ty, Christian Roth |
Month |