Subject: Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT From: Mulberry Technologies List Owner <xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:17:34 -0500 |
As much as this may be interesting and useful we both know that there are much more important things we can be dealing with...
Let's stop this thread now.
If you are not interested in continuing to participate in the discussion you are welcome to refrain. However, suggesting (especially to one of the several people involved in a discussion) that the thread be stopped seems ... well ... odd.
The original poster asked a reasonable question and there have been several reasoned responses. While debates on the best convention for forming names seem a little silly to me the larger question of how to write XSLT for long term maintainability (which is what I assume the OP had in mind when asking about standards for XSLT) is an important and interesting topic for discussion.
-- Tommie --
====================================================================== B. Tommie Usdin mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301/315-9631 Suite 207 Direct Line: 301/315-9634 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Kamal Bhatt |
Re: [xsl] generate-id() problem, Nima Kaviani | Date | Re: [xsl] RDF/OWL Transformation us, Nima Kaviani |
Month |