Subject: Re: [xsl] targeting the last element in a node or consecutive From: <Emily.Garrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:45:07 -0500 |
This appears to be working: <xsl:apply-templates select="node()[not(self::processing- instruction()[not(following-sibling::*)])]"/> Then I insert the extra element. Then grab the PIs I suppressed above: <xsl:apply-templates select="node()[self::processing- instruction()[not(following-sibling::*)]]"/> Does it look right? Thanks. --emily ----- Original Message ----- From: <egarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, January 4, 2007 2:21 pm Subject: Re: [xsl] targeting the last element in a node or consecutive elements To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Here is my logic so far to target everything in the node, and if > it is > a processing-instruction it should be processed only if something > exists after it other than another processing-instruction. What I > have > below does not work because I think it is looking for the second > processing-instruction inside the first one rather than following > it, > but it is starting to feel like it is possible to put what I need > in > one instruction. > > <xsl:apply-templates select="node()[not(self::processing-instruction() > [not(following::*[not(self::processing-instruction())])])]"/> > > Warning: on line 58 of file:/C:/Documents%20and% > 20Settings/egarrett/Desktop/Transforms%20R%20Us/saxon/xsl/X3B.xsl: > The self axis will never select any element() nodes when > starting at > an > processing-instruction() node > > Any ideas? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: egarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thursday, January 4, 2007 9:59 am > Subject: Re: [xsl] targeting the last element in a node or > consecutive > elements > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Yes, your example is correct. I don't know if or how many PIs > > will > > occur at the end of the node. > > > > P.S. I started a new post because they changed the > > requirements.... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Thursday, January 4, 2007 9:53 am > > Subject: Re: [xsl] targeting the last element in a node or > > consecutive > > elements > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Hi Emily, > > > > > > This is a double post, you already opened this discussion > under > > > "suppressing only the last PI" (which differed in details, > however).> > > > > If I may, it appears that you want to do this: > > > > > > <somenode> > > > <node1 /> > > > <?instr1?> > > > <node2 /> > > > <?instr2?> > > > <?instr3?> > > > </somenode> > > > > > > 1. Process node1, instr1, node2 etc > > > 2. Do something before instr2 and instr3 (being consecutively > > and > > > together at the end of a node) > > > 3. Process instr2 and instr3 > > > (if instr2 and instr3 were not there, you want to skip > > processing > > > step 2 > > > and 3?) > > > > > > Am i right? Please confirm (and/or give your sample input, to > > make > > > the > > > subject easier) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > -- Abel > > > > > > Emily.Garrett@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > I'm trying to use xsl:apply templates to grab the entire > > content > > > of a > > > > node, except for any PIs that may be at the very end of the > > > node. I can > > > > see how position()=last() can be used to refer to the very > > last > > > PI, but > > > > how would I refer to possibly 2 or 3 PIs that are at the end > > of > > > the node > > > > (not knowing what they are or how many), but still process > PIs > > > that are > > > > contained elsewhere in this content? Is there some syntax > > that > > > refers> to consecutive elements or refers to an element that > is > > > the last one in > > > > a node, not knowing what element it is? > > > > > > > > Here is explanation for what I'm trying to do: > > > > > > > > Process all content, unless they are PIs that occur > > > consecutively at the > > > > very end of the node. > > > > > > > > Then I have to insert an element, then process these PIs > that > > occur> > consecutively at the very end of the node. > > > > > > > > I'm having trouble narrowing down my research on this one. > > Does > > > anyone> have any ideas? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Emily
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] FO Processor Comparisons, Tristan Stevens | Thread | [xsl] Re: XML Tag to Output Math ty, Byomokesh |
Re: [xsl] targeting the last elemen, egarrett | Date | Re: [xsl] undefined reference to `x, Florent Georges |
Month |