Subject: RE: [xsl] testing for position of an element and displaying it accordingly From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:08:28 -0000 |
> That was only a typo here. In that case, when you said "Here is my complete code:" you were not telling the truth. When someone posts code and it has obvious errors, and especially when they say that the code doesn't work, but don't say what the error message was, then sometimes - just sometimes - the obvious error is the actual problem. On other occasions it just makes you suspicious that the code that was posted is not the code that actually had the problem, and there's therefore very little point spending time on debugging it. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] testing for position of a, xslt . new | Thread | Re: [xsl] testing for position of a, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] testing for position of a, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] FO and continued, Kamal Bhatt |
Month |