Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived

Mukul Gandhi wrote:

On 1/23/07, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Seriously though, it doesnt matter whether the browser supports it -
just run the transforms on your server for dynamic pages or offline
for static - let the browsers worry about rendering XHTML.


I think having XSLT 2.0 support on browser will be useful. Using XSLT
2.0 on server side is certainly an alternative. But for e.g., I just
have a plain HTTP Web Server with no Java support (Servlets, JSP etc),
then I can serve XML+XSLT to the browser, and the browser can do the
transformation.

I agree: think of all those AJAX applications transforming SOAP/REST XML to HTML that could benefit from XSLT 2.0

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, (continued) Antony Quinn - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:55:22 +0000 Colin Adams - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:58:38 +0000 Andrew Welch - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:10:57 +0000 Mukul Gandhi - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:18:08 +0530 Antony Quinn - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:01:52 +0000 <= Colin Adams - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:13:06 +0000 Mukul Gandhi - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:37:23 +0530 Abel Braaksma - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:58:52 +0100 Robert Koberg - Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:15:40 -0500

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Mukul Gandhi	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Colin Adams
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Jay Bryant
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home