Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt (multi) threading or parallelized execution From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:17:42 -0000 |
> I deal with geographic data which can be very large, and in > many cases must be dealt with as a whole in order to deal > with spatial relationships. I use xslt to process it > (elegantly, capably, correctly), but it seems a shame to > devote that much memory to a file for so long and only be > able to use 1 core on a multicore machine. For this kind of use case the simplest way forward might be to do parsing, transformation, and serialization in separate threads. Potentially of course each step in a pipeline can be done in a separate thread, with very low coordination overheads. It's probably quite possible to configure Saxon to work that way today. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt (multi) threading or, Peter Rushforth | Thread | [xsl] Generating a unique listing o, Glen Mazza |
Re: [xsl] xslt (multi) threading or, Peter Rushforth | Date | Re: [xsl] Generating a unique listi, David Carlisle |
Month |