Subject: RE: [xsl] Input requested for a good genuine example of the best parts of XSLT 2 From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:26:14 -0000 |
> > For someone starting today, if they are reasonably > competent, I would > > expect them to have an 80% implementation within a year and a 100% > > implementation within two years. > > Do you mean an implementation of a Basic or an SA XSLT 2.0 processor? It also depends on whether you've already got a 1.0 processor in your kitbag, whether you've got an existing schema processor, how much effort you put into performance, whether you write in a language that does the memory management for you, how many natural languages you localize into, how experienced your programmers are, and perhaps even (though I'm not sure about this) how large your team is. But I'll leave all those variables undefined because it gives me an excuse for being wrong. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Input requested for a goo, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Input requested for a goo, Rashmi Rubdi |
Re[3]: [xsl] troubles with document, Alexey Nickolaenkov | Date | RE: [xsl] troubles with document(), Michael Kay |
Month |