RE: [xsl] IDE

Subject: RE: [xsl] IDE
From: "Chaudhary, Harsh" <HCHAUDHA@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:22:34 -0600
I have been using Oxygen XML which is available on Windows, Linux and
MacOS. I have found it to be very similar to XML Spy. It is not free but
it is very cheap when compared to XML Spy. Plus it also has eclipse
integration.

HC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Antony Quinn [mailto:aquinn@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 3:48 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] IDE


Following on from Dimitre's mail, does anyone have any comments on IDEs
for XSLT? I've been using Komodo [1] for over 4 years, partly because it

has a good XSLT debugger, and partly because I use Linux and have
limited choice.

Cheers,

Antony

[1] http://www.activestate.com/Products/Komodo/

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
 > Dear friends,
 >
...
 >
 > This is what makes XSLT great -- I don't have to care about Java and
I
 > don't have to care about an operating system.
 >
 > The IDE I am using (the good ol' XSelerator) allows me to invoke each
 > out of ten different XSLT (2.0 or 1.0) processors in a mouse click.
 >
 > So, in case somebody wants to pursue related topics in this forum,
I'd
 > suggest a title something as "Implementation-Language-independent IDE
 > for XSLT" -- but definitely *not* this thread, please.
 >
 > Or, if somebody doesn't like XSLT 2.0 (no matter for what reasons),
 > they shouldn't feel obliged to convince the rest of us that they are
 > right -- I believe they are, the same way people, who are still
 > writing in Assembler are right, given their circumstances.
 >
 >
 > Cheers,
 > Dimitre Novatchev

Current Thread
  • [xsl] IDE
    • Antony Quinn - Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:47:44 +0000
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Chaudhary, Harsh - Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:22:34 -0600 <=