Subject: RE: [xsl] Optimization issue with includes and attribute-sets From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:59:47 -0000 |
> You mentioned attribute sets are rarely used. What would be > the preferred alternative? I wouldn't at all disparage use of attribute sets: I just observe that not many people seem to find them useful, or simply find that they are a feature they can manage without. For most simple uses of attribute sets, they're just a minor syntactic convenience over calling a named template that creates the required attributes. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Optimization issue with i, Angela Williams | Thread | [xsl] Extreme 2007 Call for Partici, B Tommie Usdin |
RE: [xsl] Optimization issue with i, Angela Williams | Date | [xsl] Extreme 2007 Call for Partici, B Tommie Usdin |
Month |