Subject: Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:21:33 -0500 |
False.Using a PI involves the same ActiveX control [as for javascript invoked transformations]
No popup in case of iframe.not popups about ActiveX, but instead, maybe, popups about cross-frame scripting
I could drag on about the unmanageability of using PIs, its lack of parameter passing possibilities, its complete lack of flexibility,You should consider PIs not instead, but in addition to the javascript invoked transformation. This way you will gain additional flexibility!
best, -Rob
But like I said, I could go on and on, but if you know all the drawbacksYou seem not to have explored this path up to now, as many of your arguments
and if you are willing to pay the extra effort involved, it is quite a stable
and save path to go
rely on general considerations, not on concrete experience.
Manfred
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Manfred Staudinger | Thread | Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Manfred Staudinger | Date | Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Abel Braaksma |
Month |