Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs named templates (Which is better?) From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:27:35 +0100 |
So I have a fairly general question. I am using XSLT 2.0 and am
interested in creating user defined functions. Which construct is better
to use... xsl:function or a named template?
I want to replace it with .....
<greater>upperfreq</greater>
<lesser>lowerfreq</lesser>
<xsl:template match="greater"> <xsl:text>upper</xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="." /> </xsl:template>
Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma http://www.nuntia.nl
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xsl:function vs named templat, Jernigan, TieSha | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:function vs named tem, Colin Adams |
Re: [xsl] FizzBuzz in XSLT 1.0. He, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] FizzBuzz in XSLT 1.0. He, M. David Peterson |
Month |