Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL History From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:44:40 +0100 |
Since 1999 XSLT and XSL-FO have been developed very independently of each other. Technically they are developed by the same Working Group (the XSL Working Group) but this is a convenient fiction: in practice there are two separate subgroups that meet separately, with only one or two members (including the chair) in common, and there are very few dependencies between the work of the two groups. So you can ask about the history of XSLT or about the history of XSL-FO, but it's a mistake to treat the two as strongly related. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Wojciech Michalik [mailto:wojtekmichalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 02 May 2007 15:27 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] XSL History > > I have difficulties to figure out what happened between two > recommendations of XSL. > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt > and > http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/ > I had found some histrorical informations here: > http://www.softwareag.com/xml/Techn_Links/xslt_book/31290105.htm > http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/OldStuff.html#OldNews > http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect1/history.html > But contents does not cover the period between those two > recommendations I will be thankfull for any hints about > historical information of that period. > > Thanks > Wojtek Michalik
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL History, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL History, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] How to show context of te, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] Help moving away from nam, Abel Braaksma |
Month |