Subject: Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type meta|
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:18:13 +0200
On 5/8/07, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:if they make such an option available with name "xhtml" rather than use a name in their own extension namespace then they are not conformant.
If I do specify "xhtml", what should be the right behaviour for processors?