Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting Using A Predefined Order From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:35:40 +0100 |
Andrew> which can also be written as: Andrew> <xsl:apply-templates select="(div[2], div[3], div[5], div[1], div[4])"/> oh yes if we're using xpath2 there's other ways as well eg <xsl:apply-templates select="for $p in (2,3,5,1,4) return div[$p]"/> this is equivalent to Andrew's although actually neither's quite equivalent to my original suggestion of 5 apply-templates calls, as in that case position() and last() would be equal to 1 each time whereas in either of the versions here, last() is 5 and position() would be 1..5, which is often preferable. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Sorting Using A Predefine, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Sorting Using A Predefine, Jeff Sese |
Re: [xsl] Looking Not Working for N, Eliot Kimber | Date | Re: [xsl] Sorting Using A Predefine, Jeff Sese |
Month |