Subject: Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</quote> From: Nic James Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:37:42 +0100 |
Andreas Peter <info@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Quoting Nic James Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Yes. Not just programming languages but CSS, HTML and Word documents >> too. > > Unfortunately I am one of those "self-taught amateur programmers". But > the point is that those poeple have to start somewhere, too. > And I agree XSL programming looked very easy at the first sight but if > you want to get deeper into this programming language it is of course > very difficult, particularly if you do not have any programming > experience. But Thank God this list exists :-) Hey! I'm a self taught amateur too! (Actually, I'm not sure who isn't). I think XSLT is quite good for non-programmers, it's programmers with some experience of other things that find it really difficult I've found. If I had 10pence for the number of times I've seen a programmer try to do something imperative in XSLT and get really, really, cross with it. -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Andreas Peter | Thread | RE: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Brian Martinez |
Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Andrew Welch |
Month |