Subject: Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</quote> From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:12:17 -0400 |
At 1:01 PM -0400 6/26/07, Robert Koberg wrote: > no you haven't. you have defended XSL's ease of use.
That's not fair and it doesn't further the conversation. Wendell has said
MANY things on this list and expressed a variety of opinions. You find one thing
he said once that differs from his current statement and assume that this all he
has ever said.
You owe Wendell an apology.
I think XSLT is quite good for non-programmers, it's programmers with some experience of other things that find it really difficult I've found.
If I had 10pence for the number of times I've seen a programmer try to do something imperative in XSLT and get really, really, cross with it.
It's also true of course that many computer science graduates have a lot still to learn. I certainly did when I was a new graduate. I still have now, that's one of the things you learn....
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, norias70482 | Thread | Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Karl Stubsjoen |
Re: [xsl] XTDE1490 and using the Sa, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</quote, Gannon Dick |
Month |