Subject: Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></tag> is the way it is (was Re: [xsl] IE Client side transformation issue) From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:07:18 -0400 |
On 8/3/07, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But in the production job where I experienced this the output was
> going to 10,000 desktops with unknown browsers.
>
> Having to code around the browser bug was bad enough ... influencing
> the writing of standard specifications around browser bugs is going too far.
It didn't push you far enough to do it on the server then...?
Seriously though, for "10,000 desktops with unknown browsers" I would've made the call very early on to do it serverside, regardless of the "browser bug".
Surely the comment hack didn't go down well...
-- Upcoming public training: XSLT/XSL-FO Sep 10, UBL/code lists Oct 1 World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Jul'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Understanding why <tag></, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] Image problem in FO, Andy Carr1 |
Month |