Subject: Re: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsing into multi level nexted From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 06:23:15 -0700 |
> Doing a google on those terms shows this excellent thread in the > archives, with many solutions: > http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200701/msg00150.html Excellent suggestion. > Instead of Muenchian, if you really *have* to stick to XSLT 1.0, ^^^^^^^^ The Muenchian method is defined and used with XSLT 1.0, why users who have to stick to XSLT 1.0 should not use it? [Excellent BTWs snipped] P.S. Abel, I tried to reach you via email, probably do not have your correct email address. Could you, please, send me a message to: dnovatchev @ google's email service -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsi, Abel Braaksma (onlin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsi, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] XSL1.0 can I define a nod, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Taking flat XML and parsi, Abel Braaksma (onlin |
Month |