RE: [xsl] Problem with xsl:number formatting

Subject: RE: [xsl] Problem with xsl:number formatting
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:00:30 -0400
At 2007-08-09 11:44 -0400, Budinger [US], Bruce wrote:
Thanks for your help. This will allow me to move forward.

The documentation is somewhat sparse on practical examples of how to use
the count and preceding-sibling type functions.

:{)} Which is why I came up with a series of training classes!


Remember that specifications are not meant to be tutorials. This comes up a lot in standards development (I also contribute to OASIS and ISO standards). A specification must objectively describe functionality. Tutorial content should be considered non-normative (also called "informative"). And some believe that non-normative content has no place in a specification.

Which makes fertile ground for books, tutorials, training classes, etc. which is good for the industry around the specification.

. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken

p.s. Crane's next hands-on XSLT 1.0/2.0 and XSL-FO 1.0/1.1 training class is September 10, 2007, and tomorrow is the "early-bird" deadline for the reduced cost of entry; registration is still open after tomorrow but the cost is higher. Details on our web site linked below.


-- Upcoming public training: XSLT/XSL-FO Sep 10, UBL/code lists Oct 1 World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Jul'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

Current Thread