Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:40:33 +0100 |
> But when this list of options gets longer, it might be better to add > normal template matching and make the precedence explicit: yes the main reason in xslt 1 for doing trick xpath predicates like this is for use in xsl:sort where the restrictions of the language mean that you have to pack all the code into a single xpath. there's no point doing it in a value-of in real code. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most, Abel Braaksma | Thread | Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most, Steve |
Month |