Subject: Re: [xsl] possible xalan error using function-available() and element-available() From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:07:13 +0200 |
I've always assumed that the only reason for testing function-available() was because you wanted to call the function, and since the function call has to use a static name, there's no conceivable reason to use function-available with a dynamic name. Perhaps I was wrong.
Cheers, -- Abel Braaksma
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] possible xalan error usin, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] possible xalan error usin, James Fuller |
Re: [xsl] possible xalan error usin, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] IE error | Switch from cu, Abel Braaksma |
Month |