Subject: Re: [xsl] More addition questions: Using node-set() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:43:59 +0100 |
> and I do this 2-3 times for different problem sets in say the same > template, node-set in most implementations is cheap (in some it's essentially a no-op) In XSLT2 the distingction between result tree fragment and node set goes away (and with it the need for a function) David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] More addition questions: , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] More addition questions: , Scott Trenda |
RE: [xsl] More addition questions: , Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Windows Batchfile calling, Houghton,Andrew |
Month |