Subject: RE: [xsl] where is an exhaustive reference for xslt? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:08:18 +0100 |
> I think I was trying to > draw the first conclusion based on what I remember from my > experiments with LRE stylesheets. Please don't do this. If you try to reverse-engineer a language specification by experimenting with various candidate instances, (a) it will take a very long time, and (b) you will probably end up inferring some pretty weird rules. There is a better way. Read the spec. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] where is an exhaustive re, Scott Trenda | Thread | Re: [xsl] where is an exhaustive re, Anthony Ettinger |
[xsl] Binaries for Gestalt, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] where is an exhaustive re, Anthony Ettinger |
Month |