Subject: RE: [xsl] How to make this script faster From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:59:01 -0000 |
> Michael Kay wrote: > > But that's not a performance issue, and nor are most of the points > > Abel made; and I have to say I couldn't see anything at all > here that > > should cause performance problems. > > > > Not even the recursion? There's nothing intrinsically inefficient about recursion. As far as I could see, the process here was linear. Sibling recursion can lead to stack overflow if the number of siblings is high, but that doesn't make it slow. I looked hard at this to see if there was any non-linearity, but if there is, I couldn't find it. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] How to make this script f, Abel Braaksma | Thread | Re: [xsl] How to make this script f, Mathieu Malaterre |
Re: [xsl] How Remove or Hide Blank , Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] How to make this script f, Mathieu Malaterre |
Month |