Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Trnasfromation - Is it possible to do a bottom up transformation? From: "Raghu Narayan Koratagere" <raghu.k.n@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:12:06 +0530 |
Abel, The problem is here you are transforming top down. If my inference is right, then you are saying P1's Unit price is Sum(P2-UnitPrice, P4-UnitPrice, P5-UnitPrice). The problem is you need to calculate UnitPrice P2, P4 and P5 in first place before this can be applied? P1 => P2 =>P3 => P4 => P5 Hope the issue is clear. I will try to get some sample data and post the actual source tree. > > > 3. If the itemTypeCode of the current Item is '3' then unitPrice is > > Sum of unitPrice of only the first level child elements > > > > <xsl:template match="unitPrice[../itemTypeCode = '3']"> > <xsl:copy><xsl:value-of select="sum(../unitPrice[1] div > ../quantity[1])" /></xsl:copy> > </xsl:template> > > > Unfortunately, it is quite unclear from your (not-well-formed!!) source > sample code what you mean by "child element". Please provide a working > set of source xml, and show us the XSLT that you currently have with the > part that's troubling you. In lieu of this, please make clear what > "recursive" means to you. Usually, a recursive template approach is > rather trivial in XSLT, but obviously, it is rather non-trivial to > invent what you might mean by "recursive" as it may have many meanings. > > If you need to calculate the sum of all unitPrice from a certain level, > arbitrarily deep, then you should use the following statement, assuming > your context node is on the right (parent) level: > > sum(.//unitPrice) > > HTH, > Cheers, > -- Abel Braaksma
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL Trnasfromation - Is i, Abel Braaksma | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL Trnasfromation - Is i, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSL Trnasfromation - Is i, Abel Braaksma | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL Trnasfromation - Is i, Michael Kay |
Month |