Subject: Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' training course PDF available From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:31:49 +0000 |
On 16/12/2007, Steve Ball <Steve.Ball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14/12/2007, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Welch wrote: > > Personally I don't think you can unit test XSLT*, it's only really > > worthwhile to test the output for a given set of inputs. > > You can certainly unit test functions, as Mike Kay points out If you include the starred footnote along with the quote, you'll see that I said that: "* Maybe with 2.0 and user defined functions it might be worthwhile, but to ensure your transforms are doing the right thing, I think the only approach it to check the output for a given set of inputs." It's a bit off to quote something that references a relevant footnote and not include the footnote itself. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' train, Steve Ball | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' train, Steve Ball |
Re: [xsl] Identity transformation f, Jesper Tverskov | Date | RE: [xsl] No Duplicate Contain() is, Michael Kay |
Month |