Subject: Re: [xsl] Compact XPath syntax From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:22:09 +0530 |
On Dec 26, 2007 8:02 PM, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Have you considered instead the following equivalent addresses: > > //b/c > //f/c This is also good ... > > >or //c (if you want to select all 'c' elements everywhere in the tree). > > Remembering, though, in all the above cases that "//" can be an > expensive XPath address and should be used sparingly. I agree strongly to this. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Compact XPath syntax, G. Ken Holman | Thread | [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Giulio Rizzo |
Re: [xsl] Compact XPath syntax, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: [xsl] stylesheet expansion, Abel Braaksma |
Month |