Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling

Subject: Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:12:57 GMT

> Wouldn't
> "xml-" be the most appropriate prefix here?

No, such names are reserved for other use. You can call it result-xml or
_xml_result or pretty much anything you like. Why trample on the
reserved names?

even w3c specs avoid doing this, consider xslt for example an early draft
had an attribute xml-declaration on xsl:output,
but they thought better of it and changed to
omit-xml-declaration
http://www.w3.org/1999/08/WD-xslt-19990813#section-XML-Output-Method

David

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling, (continued) Abel Braaksma - Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:36:28 +0100 Scott Trenda - Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:30:53 -0600 Message not available Wendell Piez - Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:18:55 -0500 Message not available Scott Trenda - Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:50:20 -0600 David Carlisle - Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:12:57 GMT <= Scott Trenda - Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:34:07 -0600 Michael Kay - Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:45:47 -0000 Rolf Ade - Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:39:00 +0100 Michael Kay - Sat, 5 Jan 2008 10:16:22 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] document() function and error-handling, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda	Thread	RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda
RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda	Date	RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda
	Month