Re: [xsl] Easy question, big headache.

["Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The only ones I know of available as free source code are Saxon
(basic-level only) and Gestalt (also basic-level only).

On 12/03/2008, Patrick Bergeron <pbergeron@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why yes, you're absolutely right.  I'll rephrase and simply say:
>
>  "XSLT 1.0 is something I have to live with [at the moment [because we're
>  about to ship [and it's not just a recompile]]]".
>
>  Here's a newbie question: what other free XSLT 2.0 processor is there out
>  there (and available as source code) ?
>
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Colin Adams [mailto:colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:05 PM
>  To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  Subject: Re: [xsl] Easy question, big headache.
>
>  On 11/03/2008, Patrick Bergeron <pbergeron@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  And yes, XSLT 1.0 is a constraint I need to live with, too bad.
>  >
>
>  It didn't sound like it to me. As far as I could tell, your only
>  limitation was that you didn't want to bother with compiling an XSLT
>  processor on your embedded system.