Subject: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0 From: "Dan Acuff" <dacuff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:39:35 -0400 |
-----Original Message----- From: Abel Braaksma [mailto:abel.online@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:48 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets.. >If you can, try XSLT 2.0. Many people find it way easier to learn than XSLT 1.0. This is for one due to the fact that >version 1.0 made it very hard to do string processing or to (re)process intermediate result trees. Quick question regarding this. Will XSLT 2.0 work with MSXML 6?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Abel Braaksma | Thread | RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Dan Acuff | Date | RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay |
Month |