Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0 From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 08:42:54 +0100 |
XSLT 2.0's use of XML Schema types is completely separate from having the xs namespace in the output... XSLT is very much dependent on the XSLT namespace - is it reasonable to have that in the output? 2008/5/6 Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx>: > I agree with Mike. > > Since XSLT 2.0 is very much dependant on XML Schema, having xs: > declaration in the output tree is reasonable. > > > On 5/6/08, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The reason for this: if the "xs" namespace had been excluded by default, we > > would have had do something special for users who want to generate something > > like <d xsi:type="xs:date"/>. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Mukul Gandhi |
[xsl] What to use instead of xsl:va, Pankaj Chaturvedi | Date | RE: [xsl] What to use instead of xs, Pankaj Chaturvedi |
Month |