Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0 From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:00 +0530 |
On 5/6/08, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ...but that contradicts what you've said above Please don't take my words literally. I was discussing possible options. > Indeed, I'm not proposing any changes, it's no big deal - just > pointing out (or perhaps looking for confirmation) that the xml schema > namespace could easily have been excluded by default. I think, pros and cons of this weigh equally. To my opinion, this cannot be classified as a bug in the spec. I also think, cost of providing this enhancement are quite high than the benefits. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, David Carlisle |
Month |