Subject: Re: [xsl] best practices re xsl:{import,include,next-match,apply-imports} From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 18:46:25 -0700 |
> No magic answer to this one. You could use apply-imports instead of > next-match - interesting to see that there is a use case for this. Is there > any reason the generic match="node()|@*" template can't be moved into the > generic stylesheet module? > > Changing the import to include seems to me to be storing up other problems > for the future. I suppose that the reason I hadn't considered the match="node()|@*" template because I had thought of traversal logic as being "more specific" than would be appropriate for a generic stylesheet. I suppose if one thinks of this as part of the library contract, that traversal is handled by the generic stylesheet and you can override that if necessary, then moving it would be appropriate. I think I'll do that, then... Thank you. :) Jim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - James A. Robinson jim.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx Stanford University HighWire Press http://highwire.stanford.edu/ +1 650 7237294 (Work) +1 650 7259335 (Fax)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] best practices re xsl:{i, Vyacheslav Sedov | Thread | [xsl] Newbie wants comments too . ., Frank Merrow |
RE: [xsl] best practices re xsl:{i, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Adding Multiple namespaces, Pankaj Chaturvedi |
Month |