Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 06:57:31 +0200 |
using JSON's serialization format for javascript objects, as a generic approach to marshalling data over the wire is probably ok ... though I see the decision to use JSON as an exercise in late optimization. I have yet to employ this optimization in any production. I know that javascript is everywhere and is part of the web and people use it and thusly want to use things like JSON ... but comparing (not saying this thread is doing this) it to XML is 'apples' and 'airplanes' ... also there is no reason why the OP can't write their own extension function. I am not against JSON ... I like little domain text based languages (cue perl, sed, awk, ack) but we live in a world where the web is mostly markup; XML is effectively HTML's brother and they share an enormous toolbase ('view source' anyone) and heritage which must be compelling at many levels. cheers, Jim Fuller
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, Liam Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, Colin Adams |
Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, Liam Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT functions for JSON, Colin Adams |
Month |