Subject: RE: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing question From: "Trevor Nicholls" <trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 01:21:03 +1200 |
Thank you David, that was very helpful. You're right, I must have run the 1.0 stylesheet through Saxon before I added the translate() to the key definition. And I've just verified that XMLSpy still chokes on the stylesheet without the variables in the key, so I wasn't deluding myself in thinking there was some kind of problem there. But I'll redo this in 2.0 because it's a lot easier to read, as you say. Can I <xsl:import> existing version 1.0 stylesheets which do other useful things into a 2.0 stylesheet which does the glossary-specific stuff? Or do I have to change them all? Currently I use xsltproc for a large number of small transforms because the performance edge over a 2.0 processor adds up to a significant time saving in the full build, and it seems that the optimal fix here would be to use Saxon for the glossary-specific stuff without having to go away and create 2.0 copies of all the low-level stylesheets. Cheers Trevor -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 12:02 a.m. To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing question
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] glossary sorting/indexing, David Carlisle |
Month |