Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt architecture From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:16:31 +0100 |
All such questions are processor-dependent. In Saxon, there should be no run-time difference between the two cases. There are compile-time differences, of course, but they shouldn't be major. Using imports rather than includes is probably marginally better, as the conflict resolution for template rules becomes easier. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Welch [mailto:andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 22 May 2008 10:25 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] xslt architecture > > From a processor's perspective: is there any difference > between one stylesheet containing 100 templates and 100 > stylesheets each containing 1 template each, with an extra > stylesheet containing 100 include statements? > > Import precedence issues aside, if they were 100 imports > instead of includes, does that make a significant difference > to the processor? > (all unique files imported once, not the same file imported > in multiple locations) > > I tend towards monolith stylesheets where there's usually no > more than a dozen or so large stylesheets, but in front of me > now is the complete opposite approach and I'm not keen... > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt architecture, bryan rasmussen | Thread | [xsl] Upgrading from server side MS, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] Please help: section labe, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Sort XML based on Tokeniz, Michael Ludwig |
Month |