Subject: RE: [xsl] self axis vs . From: "Scott Trenda" <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:46:01 -0500 |
I use <xsl:apply-templates select="self::elem" mode="someMode" /> when I'm in a more generic template and have to do the equivalent of a <xsl:if test="name() = 'elem'"><xsl:call-template name="someMode" /></xsl:if>, but can't implement the other template as a named template for one reason or another. It's just better, more compact syntax, immediately accessible in XSLT 1.0. I don't see why people would be discouraging the use of the self:: axis. ~ Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 5:21 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] self axis vs . > But for excluding a set of names from an XPath in XSLT, I > rather use the following: > > <xsl:variable name="to-exclude" as="element()+"> > <elem1/> > <ns:elem/> > ... > </xsl:variable> > > *[not(node-name(.) = $to-exclude/node-name(.))] And there I was thinking "there's no point doing lazy construction of trees; no-one in their right mind is going to create an element and then only access its name". I think I prefer the more direct: * except (elem1 | ns:elem) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] self axis vs ., Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] self axis vs ., Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] ESCAPE SINGLE QUOTES FOR , Cleyton Jordan | Date | Re: [xsl] self axis vs ., Robert Koberg |
Month |