Subject: Re: [xsl] Oracle XSLT 2.0 processor From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:48:46 +0100 |
2008/6/11 Jim Melton <jim.melton@xxxxxxx>: > I've uncovered (slightly) more information, which comforts me (as an Oracle > employee) a bit. > > At http://blogs.oracle.com/angelo/2007/12/20#a44, I found this statement: > For 10gR2, it was for working draft dated 04 April 2005. ... In XDK 11g XML > Parser and XSLT engine we implement the XSLT 2.0 Recommendation. > > I've not yet found the actual product documentation that confirms that > statement, but I know who to ask and will report back later. Wasn't 11g r1 out before XSLT 2.0 became a rec? I'll look forward to the information - yesterday I confidently corrected a potential employer that Oracle didn't have a 2.0 processor...! -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Oracle XSLT 2.0 processor, Jim Melton | Thread | Re: Re: [xsl] Oracle XSLT 2.0 proce, philip.vallone |
RE: [xsl] Oracle XSLT 2.0 processor, Jim Melton | Date | RE: [xsl] Embedded bold,italic,anch, Michael Kay |
Month |