Subject: Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-template problem From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:18:18 +0100 |
2008/6/16 Greg Fausak <lgfausak@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2008/6/16 Greg Fausak <lgfausak@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> What's a good unix xslt processor? >> >> Saxon >> >> http://saxonica.com >> > > I normally don't mess around with java based > stuff unless there just isn't any other way. I've written > my share of java code. The overhead with including a java > app in a distribution is pretty high. But, it looks like > in this xml/xslt world all roads lead to java/saxon :-) What is the overhead in including a java app in a distribution? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Colin Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Greg Fausak |
Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Colin Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] apply-templates vs. call-, Greg Fausak |
Month |