Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:28:11 +0100 |
>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Tony> Of course, it may instead be that some other open source C Tony> XSLT 2.0 processor appears, but if it did, it might well be Tony> advised to also have a libxslt-compatible API, given the Tony> Perl, Ruby, PHP, C++, and Python bindings for libxslt that Tony> are in use today. I keep meaning to provide a C binding to Gestalt - it isn't very much work to do. But somehow I never find the time. But it surely wouldn't be compatible with libxslt, as that would imply a similar architecture. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Tony Graham |
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, Tony Graham | Date | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson |
Month |